↓ Skip to main content

Social Influences on Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Ovarian Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
8 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Social Influences on Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Ovarian Cancer
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, July 2012
DOI 10.1200/jco.2011.39.4411
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated relationships of social support with disease-related biomarkers in patients with ovarian cancer. However, the clinical relevance of these findings to patient outcomes has not been established. This prospective study examined how social support relates to long-term survival among consecutive patients with ovarian cancer. We focused on two types of social support: social attachment, a type of emotional social support reflecting connections with others, and instrumental social support reflecting the availability of tangible assistance.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 139 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 16%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 7%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 31 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 31%
Psychology 38 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 33 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2025.
All research outputs
#1,064,422
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#2,749
of 31,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,802
of 210,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#10
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.