↓ Skip to main content

Screening for Syphilis Infection in Nonpregnant Adults and Adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
70 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
60 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
3 Redditors
guideline
3 clinical guideline sources
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Screening for Syphilis Infection in Nonpregnant Adults and Adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, June 2016
DOI 10.1001/jama.2016.5824
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 169 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Master 22 13%
Other 17 10%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 53 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 56 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 638. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2024.
All research outputs
#43,735
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#863
of 42,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#688
of 344,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#29
of 426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.