↓ Skip to main content

Multistate Density Functional Theory for Effective Diabatic Electronic Coupling

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Multistate Density Functional Theory for Effective Diabatic Electronic Coupling
Published in
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, June 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00915
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A multistate density functional theory (MSDFT) is presented to estimate the effective transfer integral associated with electron and hole transfer reactions. In this approach, the charge-localized diabatic states are defined by block-localization of Kohn-Sham orbitals, which constrain the electron density for each diabatic state in orbital space. This differs from the procedure used in constrained density functional theory that partitions the density within specific spatial regions. For a series of model systems, the computed transfer integrals are consistent with experimental data, and show the expected exponential attenuation with the donor-acceptor separation. The present method can be used to model charge transfer reactions including processes involving coupled electron and proton transfer.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 39%
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 43 73%
Computer Science 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 7 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2016.
All research outputs
#22,608,786
of 32,950,213 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
#5,442
of 9,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,997
of 335,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
#54
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,950,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.