You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Randomized Trial of a Multifactorial Strategy to Prevent Serious Fall Injuries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa2002183 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James Dziura, Lori Goehring, Jocelyn Wiggins, Jeremy Rich, Robert B Wallace, Charles Lu, Katy Araujo, Rich Eder, Pamela W Duncan, Dorothy Baker, Chad Boult, Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo, Nancy K Latham, Siobhan McMahon, Martha B Carnie, Maureen Fagan, Susan L Greenspan, Jay Magaziner, Peter Charpentier, Haseena Rajeevan, Joanne M McGloin, Eleni A Skokos, Shalender Bhasin, David B Reuben, David A Ganz, Erich J Greene, Shehzad Basaria, Jerry H Gurwitz, Patricia C Dykes, Thomas W Storer, Priscilla Gazarian, Michael E Miller, Thomas G Travison, Denise Esserman, Neil Alexander, Fred Ko, Albert L Siu, Elena Volpi, Albert W Wu, Stephen C Waring, Carri Casteel, Neil M Resnick, Can Meng, Heather Allore, Brooke F Brawley, Peter Peduzzi, Thomas M Gill |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 195 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 53 | 27% |
| Australia | 16 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 8% |
| Spain | 11 | 6% |
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| Greece | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 56 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 111 | 57% |
| Scientists | 61 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 4% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 328 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Researcher | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 57 | 17% |
| Unknown | 162 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 9% |
| Unknown | 177 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 264. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2025.
All research outputs
#174,740
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#3,674
of 38,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,634
of 458,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#81
of 315 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 315 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.