↓ Skip to main content

Unresolved Discrepancies between Cannabinoid Test Results for Infant Urine

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Chemistry, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Unresolved Discrepancies between Cannabinoid Test Results for Infant Urine
Published in
Clinical Chemistry, September 2012
DOI 10.1373/clinchem.2012.190090
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

False-positive drug screen results for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) have been observed. This study investigated the rate of unconfirmed positive screen results in infant and noninfant urine samples and evaluated possible reasons for differences.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2013.
All research outputs
#6,330,612
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Chemistry
#2,345
of 7,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,176
of 170,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Chemistry
#12
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.