You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cults of personality, preference falsification, and the dictator’s dilemma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Theoretical Politics, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0951629820927790 |
| Authors |
Charles Crabtree, Holger L Kern, David A Siegel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 44% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Scientists | 7 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 12 | 46% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 8% |
| Psychology | 2 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2022.
All research outputs
#683,934
of 25,391,066 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Theoretical Politics
#2
of 288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,666
of 404,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Theoretical Politics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,066 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them