↓ Skip to main content

Sneeze reflex: facts and fiction

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 838)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
30 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
28 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
reddit
8 Redditors
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
2 YouTube creators
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sneeze reflex: facts and fiction
Published in
Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease, July 2009
DOI 10.1177/1753465809340571
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Sneezing is a protective reflex, and is sometimes a sign of various medical conditions. Sneezing has been a remarkable sign throughout the history. In Asia and Europe, superstitions regarding sneezing extend through a wide range of races and countries, and it has an ominous significance. Although sneezing is a protective reflex response, little else is known about it. A sneeze (or sternutation) is expulsion of air from the lungs through the nose and mouth, most commonly caused by the irritation of the nasal mucosa. Sneezing can further be triggered through sudden exposure to bright light, a particularly full stomach and physical stimulants of the trigeminal nerve, as a result of central nervous system pathologies such as epilepsy, posterior inferior cerebellar artery syndrome or as a symptom of psychogenic pathologies. In this first comprehensive review of the sneeze reflex in the English literature, we aim to review the pathophysiology, etiology, diagnosis, treatment and complications of sneezing.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 154 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Student > Master 15 10%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Other 7 4%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 62 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Engineering 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 64 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 284. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2026.
All research outputs
#157,526
of 34,441,029 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease
#3
of 838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288
of 157,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,441,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them