↓ Skip to main content

The ubiquitin–proteasome system and signal transduction pathways regulating Epithelial Mesenchymal transition of cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Science, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The ubiquitin–proteasome system and signal transduction pathways regulating Epithelial Mesenchymal transition of cancer
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Science, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1423-0127-19-67
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Epithelial to Mesenchymal transition (EMT) in cancer, a process permitting cancer cells to become mobile and metastatic, has a signaling hardwire forged from development. Multiple signaling pathways that regulate carcinogenesis enabling characteristics in neoplastic cells such as proliferation, resistance to apoptosis and angiogenesis are also the main players in EMT. These pathways, as almost all cellular processes, are in their turn regulated by ubiquitination and the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System (UPS). Ubiquitination is the covalent link of target proteins with the small protein ubiquitin and serves as a signal to target protein degradation by the proteasome or to other outcomes such as endocytosis, degradation by the lysosome or specification of cellular localization. This paper reviews signal transduction pathways regulating EMT and being regulated by ubiquitination.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 76 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 21%
Student > Master 15 19%
Other 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 12 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2022.
All research outputs
#5,405,680
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#224
of 1,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,022
of 184,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.