You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Critical evaluation of stable isotope mixing end-members for estimating groundwater recharge sources: case study from the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA
|
---|---|
Published in |
Hydrogeology Journal, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10040-020-02194-y |
Authors |
John E. Solder, Kimberly R. Beisner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 20% |
Researcher | 8 | 16% |
Lecturer | 6 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 22% |
Environmental Science | 10 | 20% |
Engineering | 6 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 18 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#860,012
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from Hydrogeology Journal
#13
of 817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,832
of 435,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrogeology Journal
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.