↓ Skip to main content

日本語・アイヌ語を録音した100年前の蝋管の修復・保存及び音声再生(<小特集>貴重な音声・音楽データの採録・修復・保存を考える)

Overview of attention for article published in Acoustical Science and Technology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
日本語・アイヌ語を録音した100年前の蝋管の修復・保存及び音声再生(<小特集>貴重な音声・音楽データの採録・修復・保存を考える)
Published in
Acoustical Science and Technology, June 2017
DOI 10.20697/jasj.60.7_392
Authors

伊福部 達, 清水 康行

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,516,962
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Acoustical Science and Technology
#90
of 585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,292
of 332,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acoustical Science and Technology
#15
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 585 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.