↓ Skip to main content

Corpus Linguistics Methods in the Study of (Meta)Argumentation

Overview of attention for article published in Argumentation, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corpus Linguistics Methods in the Study of (Meta)Argumentation
Published in
Argumentation, July 2020
DOI 10.1007/s10503-020-09533-z
Authors

Martin Hinton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 9 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 15 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 9 23%
Social Sciences 6 15%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 14 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2020.
All research outputs
#20,628,258
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Argumentation
#266
of 286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#340,085
of 397,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Argumentation
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 286 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.