Title |
Mortality among US employees of a large computer manufacturing company: 1969–2001
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Health, October 2006
|
DOI | 10.1186/1476-069x-5-30 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Richard W Clapp |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 24 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 19% |
Researcher | 4 | 15% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 23% |
Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 38% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 12% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 6 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2013.
All research outputs
#3,274,617
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#578
of 1,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,748
of 85,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.