You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Genetic Landscape and Epidemiology of Phenylketonuria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Human Genetics, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.06.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alicia Hillert, Yair Anikster, Amaya Belanger-Quintana, Alberto Burlina, Barbara K Burton, Carla Carducci, Ana E Chiesa, John Christodoulou, Maja Đorđević, Lourdes R Desviat, Aviva Eliyahu, Roeland A F Evers, Lena Fajkusova, François Feillet, Pedro E Bonfim-Freitas, Maria Giżewska, Polina Gundorova, Daniela Karall, Katya Kneller, Sergey I Kutsev, Vincenzo Leuzzi, Harvey L Levy, Uta Lichter-Konecki, Ania C Muntau, Fares Namour, Mariusz Oltarzewski, Andrea Paras, Belen Perez, Emil Polak, Alexander V Polyakov, Francesco Porta, Marianne Rohrbach, Sabine Scholl-Bürgi, Norma Spécola, Maja Stojiljković, Nan Shen, Luiz C Santana-da Silva, Anastasia Skouma, Francjan van Spronsen, Vera Stoppioni, Beat Thöny, Friedrich K Trefz, Jerry Vockley, Youngguo Yu, Johannes Zschocke, Georg F Hoffmann, Sven F Garbade, Nenad Blau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 18% |
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| Israel | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Poland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 346 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 11% |
| Researcher | 35 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 10% |
| Unknown | 175 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 9% |
| Unknown | 187 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 381. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#84,106
of 26,018,952 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#33
of 5,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,998
of 432,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#2
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,018,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.