↓ Skip to main content

Plasmonic Nanolaser Using Epitaxially Grown Silver Film

Overview of attention for article published in Science, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
12 X users
patent
8 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
533 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Plasmonic Nanolaser Using Epitaxially Grown Silver Film
Published in
Science, July 2012
DOI 10.1126/science.1223504
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A nanolaser is a key component for on-chip optical communications and computing systems. Here, we report on the low-threshold, continuous-wave operation of a subdiffraction nanolaser based on surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation. The plasmonic nanocavity is formed between an atomically smooth epitaxial silver film and a single optically pumped nanorod consisting of an epitaxial gallium nitride shell and an indium gallium nitride core acting as gain medium. The atomic smoothness of the metallic film is crucial for reducing the modal volume and plasmonic losses. Bimodal lasing with similar pumping thresholds was experimentally observed, and polarization properties of the two modes were used to unambiguously identify them with theoretically predicted modes. The all-epitaxial approach opens a scalable platform for low-loss, active nanoplasmonics.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 533 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 12 2%
Germany 4 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 496 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 178 33%
Researcher 82 15%
Student > Master 63 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 33 6%
Professor 26 5%
Other 73 14%
Unknown 78 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 218 41%
Engineering 112 21%
Materials Science 55 10%
Chemistry 31 6%
Chemical Engineering 5 <1%
Other 23 4%
Unknown 89 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2026.
All research outputs
#1,338,278
of 34,089,221 outputs
Outputs from Science
#22,330
of 93,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,392
of 213,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#141
of 800 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,089,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 800 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.