| Title |
The NEIGHBOR Consortium Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Genome-wide Association Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Glaucoma, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1097/ijg.0b013e31824d4fd8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janey L. Wiggs, Michael A. Hauser, Wael Abdrabou, Robert Rand Allingham, Donald L. Budenz, Elizabeth DelBono, David S. Friedman, Jae H. Kang, Douglas Gaasterland, Terry Gaasterland, Richard K. Lee, Paul R. Lichter, Stephanie Loomis, Yutao Liu, Cathy McCarty, Felipe A. Medeiros, Sayoko E. Moroi, Lana M. Olson, Anthony Realini, Julia E. Richards, Frank W. Rozsa, Joel S. Schuman, Kuldev Singh, Joshua D. Stein, Douglas Vollrath, Robert N. Weinreb, Gadi Wollstein, Brian L. Yaspan, Sachiko Yoneyama, Don Zack, Kang Zhang, Margaret Pericak-Vance, Louis R. Pasquale, Jonathan L. Haines |
| Abstract |
Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is a common disease with complex inheritance. The identification of genes predisposing to POAG is an important step toward the development of novel gene-based methods of diagnosis and treatment. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have successfully identified genes contributing to complex traits such as POAG however, such studies frequently require very large sample sizes, and thus, collaborations and consortia have been of critical importance for the GWAS approach. In this report we describe the formation of the NEIGHBOR consortium, the harmonized case control definitions used for a POAG GWAS, the clinical features of the cases and controls, and the rationale for the GWAS study design. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 60 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 21% |
| Professor | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |