↓ Skip to main content

Burkitt lymphoma in the modern era: real-world outcomes and prognostication across 30 US cancer centers

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
reddit
1 Redditor
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Burkitt lymphoma in the modern era: real-world outcomes and prognostication across 30 US cancer centers
Published in
Blood, January 2021
DOI 10.1182/blood.2020006926
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We examined adults with untreated Burkitt lymphoma (BL) from 2009-2018 across 30 US cancer centers. Factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in univariate and multivariate Cox models. Among 641 BL patients, baseline features included: median age 47 years; HIV+ 22%; ECOG performance status (PS) 2-4 in 23%; >1 extranodal site 43%; advanced-stage 78%; and central nervous system (CNS) involvement 19%. Treatment-related mortality (TRM) was 10% with most common causes being sepsis, gastrointestinal bleed/perforation, and respiratory failure. With 45-month median follow-up, 3-year PFS and OS rates were 64% and 70%, respectively, without differences by HIV status. Survival was better for patients who received rituximab vs. not (3-year PFS 67% vs. 38%; OS 72% vs. 44%; P<0.001) without difference based on setting of administration (inpatient/outpatient). Outcomes were also improved at an academic vs. community center (3-year PFS 67% vs. 46%, P=0.006; OS 72% vs. 53%, P=0.01). In multivariate models, ages ≥40 (PFS HR=1.70, P=0.001; OS HR=2.09, P<0.001), ECOG PS 2-4 (PFS HR=1.60, P<0.001; OS HR=1.74, P=0.003), LDH >3x (PFS HR=1.83, P<0.001; OS HR=1.63, P=0.009), and CNS involvement (PFS HR=1.52, P=0.017; OS HR=1.67, P=0.014) predicted inferior survival. Further, survival varied based on number of factors present (0, 1, 2-4 factors): 3-year PFS rates 91%, 73%, 50%, respectively; 3-year OS rates 95%, 77%, 56%, respectively. Collectively, outcomes for adult BL in this real-world analysis appeared more modest compared with results of clinical trials and smaller series. In addition, prognostic factors at diagnosis identified patients with divergent survival rates.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 12%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Master 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 36 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 41%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 42 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2025.
All research outputs
#2,422,256
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#3,194
of 47,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,437
of 571,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#45
of 305 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 571,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 305 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.