↓ Skip to main content

Nanoconfined Water Effect on CO2 Utilization and Geological Storage

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nanoconfined Water Effect on CO2 Utilization and Geological Storage
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, July 2020
DOI 10.1029/2020gl087999
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 56%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 22%
Energy 2 11%
Linguistics 1 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 10 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,747,601
of 28,738,224 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#10,082
of 23,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,909
of 433,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#207
of 374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,738,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.