↓ Skip to main content

The influence of hip abduction and external rotation on sacroiliac motion

Overview of attention for article published in Manual Therapy, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The influence of hip abduction and external rotation on sacroiliac motion
Published in
Manual Therapy, November 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.math.2008.08.009
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is conventionally accepted as a sagittal joint with little mobility in other planes, recent research has shown evidence for reduced hip abduction and axial rotation in patients with sacroiliac pain. A sample of healthy individuals was investigated to determine whether innominate motion about the sacroiliac joint can be predicted from abduction and external rotation displacement of the femur. The motion of the innominate and femur were tracked as the hip was passively rotated by standardized increments of 10 degrees into (1) abduction; (2) external rotation; and (3) a combination of external rotation and abduction. Although sagittal and transverse plane innominate motion both increased significantly as the hip was rotated further into either abduction or external rotation, external rotation was the strongest predictor of change in innominate angle. A combination of external rotation and abduction led to greater increases in these innominate angles at a smaller degree of hip rotation. The results support the use of abduction and external rotation hip displacements (both singularly and in combination) for assessing SIJ mobility at least in the axes investigated. Further research that investigates the use of these tests in people with SIJ disorders is warranted.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 165 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 39%
Other 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 20 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Physics and Astronomy 9 5%
Sports and Recreations 9 5%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 24 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2016.
All research outputs
#16,537,153
of 27,773,453 outputs
Outputs from Manual Therapy
#4
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,749
of 114,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Manual Therapy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,773,453 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one scored the same or higher as 18 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them