↓ Skip to main content

Combination of in-situ collagen injection and rehabilitative treatment in long-lasting facial nerve palsy: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Combination of in-situ collagen injection and rehabilitative treatment in long-lasting facial nerve palsy: a pilot randomized controlled trial
Published in
European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, July 2020
DOI 10.23736/s1973-9087.20.06393-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Many rehabilitative attempts have been made to prevent or reduce residual deficits in patients with established and long-term facial palsy (FP). In many clinical settings in-situ injection of collagen-based medical devices (MDs) have been demonstrated to provide nutritional support for tissues. To test the effectiveness of a collagen-based treatment for patients complaining of long standing FP, who are following a proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation protocol (Kabat method) (Group A), compared to a FP group only undergoing the Kabat method (Group B). Randomised controlled trial. Tertiary referral outpatient center and University Hospital. 41 patients with a medical diagnosis of long-term unilateral peripheral FP. Twenty-one Group A patients were compared, after randomization, to nineteen matched Group B patients after 8 weeks of treatment. The outcomes were electromyographic findings, validated questionnaires (Facial Disability Index, FDI and General health-related quality of life assessment, QOL) and clinical grading (House-Brackmann, HB, and synkinesis grading scale). A correlation analysis was performed between pre-/post-treatment differences (Δ) in outcome and clinical-demographic measures. A significant within-subjects improvement, both in electrophysiological and questionnaire scores, was found in both groups. When compared with Group B, Group A patients exhibited a significant reduction of post-treatment polyphasic potentials of voluntary activity of orbicularis oculi (p = 0.017) and oris (p = 0.015) and a significant increase in post-treatment duration of voluntary activity of orbicularis oris (p = 0.018). Group A subjects demonstrated a significant improvement in questionnaire subscales regarding overall disease perception. Although positive correlations between the ΔFDI and Δpercentage of polyphasic potentials of voluntary activity were found in both groups, negative correlations in Group A were found between disease duration and Δduration of voluntary activity of orbicularis oculi and oris. The combination of physical rehabilitative procedures with in-situ collagen injections, possibly acting in redirecting the phenomena of reinnervation/reorganization, demonstrated encouraging results in patients affected by long term FP. In-situ collagen injection could be a safe option enlarging the 'window of opportunity' to improve the voluntary muscle contraction pattern and general and specific disability referred by patients affected by long standing FP.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 2%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 54 66%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 56 68%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2020.
All research outputs
#22,771,990
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
#587
of 677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#371,049
of 429,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 677 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.