↓ Skip to main content

Spatially variable natural selection and the divergence between parapatric subspecies of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta, Pinaceae)

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Botany, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Spatially variable natural selection and the divergence between parapatric subspecies of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta, Pinaceae)
Published in
American Journal of Botany, August 2012
DOI 10.3732/ajb.1200055
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Plant populations arrayed across sharp environmental gradients are ideal systems for identifying the genetic basis of ecologically relevant phenotypes. A series of five uplifted marine terraces along the northern coast of California represents one such system where morphologically distinct populations of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) are distributed across sharp soil gradients ranging from fertile soils near the coast to podzolic soils ca. 5 km inland.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Poland 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 39 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 48%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Environmental Science 3 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2017.
All research outputs
#15,247,248
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Botany
#3,733
of 4,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,546
of 164,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Botany
#16
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.