↓ Skip to main content

Bone marrow processing for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: recommendations of the SFGM-TC

Overview of attention for article published in Hématologie, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
guideline
1 clinical guideline source
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bone marrow processing for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: recommendations of the SFGM-TC
Published in
Hématologie, December 2015
DOI 10.1684/hma.2015.1070

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2025.
All research outputs
#9,790,700
of 29,385,863 outputs
Outputs from Hématologie
#3
of 11 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,051
of 408,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hématologie
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,385,863 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one scored the same or higher as 8 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them