Neural progenitor cells (NPCs) derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) can be differentiated to neural cells that model neurodegenerative diseases and be used in the screening of potential drugs to ameliorate the disease phenotype. Traditionally, NPCs are produced in 2D cultures, in low yields, using a laborious process that includes generation of embryonic bodies, plating, and colony selections. To simplify the process and generate large numbers of hiPSC-derived NPCs, we introduce a microcarrier (MC) system for the expansion of a hiPSC line and its subsequent differentiation to NPC, using iPS (IMR90) as a model cell line. In the expansion stage, a process of cell propagation in serum-free MC culture was developed first in static culture, which is then scaled up in stirred spinner flasks. A 7.7-fold expansion of iPS (IMR90) and cell yield of 1.3×10⁶ cells/mL in 7 days of static MC culture were achieved. These cells maintained expression of OCT 3/4 and TRA-1-60 and possessed a normal karyotype over 10 passages. A higher cell yield of 6.1×10⁶ cells/mL and 20-fold hiPSC expansion were attained using stirred spinner flasks (seeded from MC static cultures) and changing the medium-exchange regimen from once to twice a day. In the differentiation stage, NPCs were generated with 78%-85% efficiency from hiPSCs using a simple serum-free differentiation protocol. Finally, the integrated process of cell expansion and differentiation of hiPSCs into NPCs using an MC in spinner flasks yielded 333 NPCs per seeded hiPSC as compared to 53 in the classical 2D tissue culture protocol. Similar results were obtained with the HES-3 human embryonic stem cell line. These NPCs were further differentiated into βIII-tubulin⁺ neurons, GFAP⁺ astrocytes, and O4⁺ oligodendrocytes, showing that cells maintained their multilineage differentiation potential.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2026.
All research outputs
#4,415,902
of 31,591,940 outputs
Outputs from Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods
#97
of 791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,593
of 210,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,591,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
