↓ Skip to main content

Viral vectors as vaccine platforms: from immunogenicity to impact

Overview of attention for article published in Current Opinion in Immunology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 2,442)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users
patent
5 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
353 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Viral vectors as vaccine platforms: from immunogenicity to impact
Published in
Current Opinion in Immunology, June 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.coi.2016.05.014
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Viral vectors are the vaccine platform of choice for many pathogens that have thwarted efforts towards control using conventional vaccine approaches. Although the STEP trial encumbered development of recombinant human adenovirus vectors only a few years ago, replication-deficient simian adenoviruses have since emerged as a crucial component of clinically effective prime-boost regimens. The vectors discussed here elicit functionally relevant cellular and humoral immune responses, at extremes of age and in diverse populations. The recent Ebola virus outbreak highlighted the utility of viral vectored vaccines in facilitating a rapid response to public health emergencies. Meanwhile, technological advances in manufacturing to support scale-up of viral vectored vaccines have helped to consolidate their position as a leading approach to tackling 'old' and emerging infections.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 350 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 14%
Student > Bachelor 43 12%
Researcher 40 11%
Other 15 4%
Other 49 14%
Unknown 109 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 57 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 53 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 5%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 119 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 133. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2022.
All research outputs
#389,825
of 34,089,221 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Immunology
#11
of 2,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,627
of 344,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Immunology
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,089,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.