Pharmacological ascorbate (AscH(-)) induces cytotoxicity and oxidative stress selectively in pancreatic cancer cells compared with normal cells. Positron emission tomography (PET) with the thymidine analog 3'-deoxy-3'-((18)F) fluorothymidine (FLT) enables noninvasive imaging and quantification of the proliferation fraction of tumors. We hypothesized that the rate of tumor proliferation determined by FLT-PET imaging, would be inversely proportional to tumor susceptibility to pharmacological AscH(-)-based treatments. Indeed, there was decreased FLT uptake in human pancreatic cancer cells treated with AscH(-) in vitro, and this effect was abrogated by co-treatment with catalase. In separate experiments, cells were treated with AscH(-), ionizing radiation or a combination of both. These studies demonstrated that combined AscH(-) and radiation treatment resulted in a significant decrease in FLT uptake that directly correlated with decreased clonogenic survival. MicroPET (18)F-FLT scans of mice with pre-established tumors demonstrated that AscH(-) treatment induced radiosensitization compared to radiation treatment alone. These data support testing of pharmacological ascorbate as a radiosensitizer in pancreatic cancer as well as the use of FLT-PET to monitor response to therapy.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2026.
All research outputs
#26,230,308
of 31,513,782 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Research
#2,663
of 2,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329,129
of 425,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Research
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,513,782 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
