↓ Skip to main content

Can a highly flexible copper( i ) cluster-containing 1D and 2D coordination polymers exhibit MOF-like properties?

Overview of attention for article published in Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Can a highly flexible copper( i ) cluster-containing 1D and 2D coordination polymers exhibit MOF-like properties?
Published in
Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, January 2016
DOI 10.1039/c6dt01375a
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The reaction of CuI with the highly flexible dithioether ligand p-TolS(CH2)8STol-p affords both in MeCN or in EtCN the 2D coordination polymers [Cu8I8{p-TolS(CH2)8STol-p}3(solvent)2]n ( and ) containing octanuclear Cu8I8 clusters as connection nodes. In contrast, treatment of CuI with p-tBuC6H4S(CH2)8SC6H4But-p in EtCN solution leads to the formation of the luminescent 1D CP [Cu4I4{tBuC6H4S(CH2)8SC6H4-tBu}2(EtCN)2]n () incorporating Cu4(μ3-I)4 clusters of the closed cubane type as secondary building units (SBUs). The 2D coordination polymers and demonstrate the ability to lose their solvent crystallisation molecules under vacuum and readsorb the same or a new one using vapor as monitored by powder X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric, IR, chromaticity, emission spectra and emission lifetime measurements. Conversely, the 1D material does not readsorb EtCN, likely due to the collapse of the macrocycles formed by the metal cluster nodes and flexible long-chained ArSC8SAr ligands but absorbs a smaller substrate such as CO2.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 7%
Canada 1 7%
Unknown 12 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 29%
Professor 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 9 64%
Chemical Engineering 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Materials Science 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2016.
All research outputs
#24,756,003
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
#12,080
of 24,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,705
of 446,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
#687
of 2,104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,749 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.