↓ Skip to main content

Immunohistochemical investigation of nerve fiber presence and morphology in elderly cervical spine meniscoids

Overview of attention for article published in Spine Journal, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Immunohistochemical investigation of nerve fiber presence and morphology in elderly cervical spine meniscoids
Published in
Spine Journal, June 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.06.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Innervation of anatomical structures is fundamental to their capacity to generate nociceptive impulses. Cervical spine meniscoids are hypothesised to be contributors to neck pain, however their innervation is not comprehensively understood. To examine the presence and morphology of nerve fibres within cervical spine meniscoids and adjacent joint capsules. Cross-sectional study. Cervical hemispines of 12 embalmed cadavers (mean [SD] age 82.9 [6.5] years, six female, six left). Cervical spine meniscoids and adjacent joint capsules were excised from lateral atlantoaxial and cervical zygapophyseal (C2-3 - C6-7) joints (n=67), then paraffin embedded. Meniscoids were sectioned sagittally (5 µm), slide mounted, and immunohistochemistry performed using primary antibodies to neurofilament heavy (NF-H) and pan-neurofilament (Pan-NF) to identify nerve tissue. The study was supported by institutional graduate student funding. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Seventy-seven meniscoids (23 lateral atlantoaxial, 54 cervical zygapophyseal) were extracted and processed (154 sections in total). Sixty-four individual nerve fibre bundles were identified (26 NF-H positive, 38 Pan-NF positive) from 14 meniscoids. Nerves immunoreactive to both NF-H and Pan-NF were identified in 13/77 meniscoids (10/14 lateral atlantoaxial joint) from 11 joints (8 cadavers). Nerves were always located in joint capsules except three exclusively Pan-NF immunoreactive nerve fibre bundles from two adipose meniscoids. The low nerve prevalence in elderly cervical spine meniscoids, with nerves only found in two adipose type meniscoids, suggests these structures may play a minimal role in cervical nociception generation in this demographic. The more frequently innervated joint capsules are more likely nociception generators in the elderly. Joint capsule nerves were mostly NF-H positive indicating potential Aδ-fibre presence.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 20%
Researcher 4 16%
Professor 3 12%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Neuroscience 3 12%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2026.
All research outputs
#10,398,211
of 34,557,610 outputs
Outputs from Spine Journal
#1,014
of 4,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,425
of 344,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Spine Journal
#10
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,557,610 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.