You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Preliminary Clinical Evaluation of Toxicity and Efficacy of A New Astaxanthin-rich Haematococcus pluvialis Extract
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.3164/jcbn.08-238 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akira Satoh, Shinji Tsuji, Yumika Okada, Nagisa Murakami, Maki Urami, Keisuke Nakagawa, Masaharu Ishikura, Mikiyuki Katagiri, Yoshihiko Koga, Takuji Shirasawa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 20% |
| Unknown | 25 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,489,937
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
#102
of 566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,643
of 107,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.