Defining Optimal Outcomes in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Overview of attention for article published in ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, July 2020

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 21 X users

facebook: 1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley: 9 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Defining Optimal Outcomes in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.
Published in	ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, July 2020
DOI	10.1097/mat.0000000000001228
Pubmed ID	32701625
Authors	Manreet K Kanwar, Colleen K McIlvennan, Lisa C Lohmueller, Stephen H Bailey, Joseph G Rogers, Jeffrey Teuteberg, Jennifer Cowger

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
United States	6	29%
Italy	2	10%
Spain	1	5%
Germany	1	5%
Unknown	11	52%

Demographic breakdown

Type
Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	15	71%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	3	14%
Scientists	2	10%
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)	1	5%

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Unknown	9	100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Professor > Associate Professor	1	11%
Student > Bachelor	1	11%
Lecturer	1	11%
Student > Postgraduate	1	11%
Unknown	5	56%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	2	22%
Engineering	1	11%
Unknown	6	67%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2020.

All research outputs

#3,195,204

of 34,411,289 outputs

Outputs from ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs

#273

of 3,547 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#63,869

of 457,653 outputs

Outputs of similar age from ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs

#14

of 62 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 3,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.