| Title |
Barriers and facilitators to deprescribing in primary care: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BJGP Open, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgpopen20x101096 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alison Jayne Doherty, Paul Boland, Janet Reed, Andrew J Clegg, Anne-Marie Stephani, Nefyn Howard Williams, Beth Shaw, Lynn Hedgecoe, Ruaraidh Hill, Lauren Walker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 22 | 28% |
| Spain | 13 | 16% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Uruguay | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 34 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 15% |
| Scientists | 8 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 143 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 60 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 61 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#628,636
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#20
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,733
of 428,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.