↓ Skip to main content

Subterranean infrastructures in a sinking city: the politics of visibility in Jakarta

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Asian Studies, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 325)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Subterranean infrastructures in a sinking city: the politics of visibility in Jakarta
Published in
Critical Asian Studies, July 2020
DOI 10.1080/14672715.2020.1793210
Authors

Emma Colven

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Lecturer 9 13%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 26 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 15 21%
Environmental Science 9 13%
Engineering 7 10%
Unspecified 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 26 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,395,230
of 23,225,652 outputs
Outputs from Critical Asian Studies
#46
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,644
of 399,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Asian Studies
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,225,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.