You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Documentation of Surface Fault Rupture and Ground-Deformation Features Produced by the 4 and 5 July 2019 Mw 6.4 and Mw 7.1 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Seismological Research Letters, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1785/0220190322 |
| Authors |
Daniel J. Ponti, James Luke Blair, Carla M. Rosa, Kate Thomas, Alexandra J. Pickering, Sinan Akciz, Stephen Angster, Jean-Philipe Avouac, Jeffrey Bachhuber, Steven Bacon, Nicolas Barth, Scott Bennett, Kelly Blake, Stephan Bork, Benjamin Brooks, Thomas Bullard, Paul Burgess, Colin Chupik, Timothy Dawson, Michael DeFrisco, Jaime Delano, Stephen DeLong, James Dolan, Andrea Donnellan, Christopher DuRoss, Todd Ericksen, Erik Frost, Gareth Funning, Ryan Gold, Nicholas Graehl, Carlos Gutierrez, Elizabeth Haddon, Alexandra Hatem, John Helms, Janis Hernandez, Christopher Hitchcock, Peter Holland, Kenneth Hudnut, Katherine Kendrick, Richard Koehler, Ozgur Kozaci, Tyler Ladinsky, Robert Leeper, Christopher Madugo, Maxime Mareschal, James McDonald, Devin McPhillips, Christopher Milliner, Daniel Mongovin, Alexander Morelan, Stephanie Nale, Johanna Nevitt, Matt O’Neal, Brian Olson, Michael Oskin, Salena Padilla, Jason Patton, Belle Philibosian, Ian Pierce, Cynthia Pridmore, Nathaniel Roth, David Sandwell, Katherine Scharer, Gordon Seitz, Drake Singleton, Bridget Smith-Konter, Eleanor Spangler, Brian Swanson, Jessica Thompson Jobe, Jerome Treiman, Francesca Valencia, Joshua Vanderwal, Alana Williams, Xiaohua Xu, Judith Zachariasen, Jade Zimmerman, Robert Zinke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 43% |
| Spain | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
| Scientists | 7 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 22% |
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 78% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,598,058
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Seismological Research Letters
#131
of 1,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,784
of 398,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seismological Research Letters
#6
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.