↓ Skip to main content

Book Review: Human Operators: A Critical Oral History on Technology in Libraries and Archives

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Book Review: Human Operators: A Critical Oral History on Technology in Libraries and Archives
Published in
Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, July 2020
DOI 10.7710/2162-3309.2370
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2020.
All research outputs
#15,620,220
of 23,225,652 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication
#245
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,113
of 398,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,225,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.