| Title |
Pulling at the heart: COVID-19, race/ethnicity and ongoing disparities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Cardiology, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41569-020-0416-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 63% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 76% |
| Scientists | 6 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 37 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 43 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,795,594
of 32,718,554 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Cardiology
#363
of 2,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,751
of 447,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Cardiology
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,718,554 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.