↓ Skip to main content

How Low Can You Go? Physical Production Mechanism of Elephant Infrasonic Vocalizations

Overview of attention for article published in Science, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
35 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
How Low Can You Go? Physical Production Mechanism of Elephant Infrasonic Vocalizations
Published in
Science, August 2012
DOI 10.1126/science.1219712
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Elephants can communicate using sounds below the range of human hearing ("infrasounds" below 20 hertz). It is commonly speculated that these vocalizations are produced in the larynx, either by neurally controlled muscle twitching (as in cat purring) or by flow-induced self-sustained vibrations of the vocal folds (as in human speech and song). We used direct high-speed video observations of an excised elephant larynx to demonstrate flow-induced self-sustained vocal fold vibration in the absence of any neural signals, thus excluding the need for any "purring" mechanism. The observed physical principles of voice production apply to a wide variety of mammals, extending across a remarkably large range of fundamental frequencies and body sizes, spanning more than five orders of magnitude.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Austria 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Botswana 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 187 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 14%
Student > Master 19 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 40 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 34%
Environmental Science 16 8%
Engineering 9 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 4%
Psychology 8 4%
Other 46 23%
Unknown 45 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 192. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2026.
All research outputs
#262,286
of 34,518,784 outputs
Outputs from Science
#6,812
of 94,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,099
of 215,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#26
of 801 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,784 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 801 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.