↓ Skip to main content

Experimental and Computational Study of a New Wheel-Shaped {[W5O21]3[(UVIO2)2(μ‑O2)]3}30– Polyoxometalate

Overview of attention for article published in Inorganic Chemistry, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Experimental and Computational Study of a New Wheel-Shaped {[W5O21]3[(UVIO2)2(μ‑O2)]3}30– Polyoxometalate
Published in
Inorganic Chemistry, August 2012
DOI 10.1021/ic3005536
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A new wheel-shaped polyoxometalate {[W(5)O(21)](3)[(U(VI)O(2))(2)(μ-O(2))](3)}(30-) has been synthesized and structurally characterized. The calculated electrostatic potential reveals the protonation of several μ-oxo bridges reducing the polyoxometalate total charge. A protonated structure computed at the density functional level of theory (DFT) is in good agreement with the experimental fit. This species presents a classical polyoxometalate electronic structure with well-defined metal and oxo bands belonging to its U/W and oxo/peroxo constituents, respectively. Furthermore, fragment calculations indicate that the electronic structures of the uranyl-peroxide and polyoxotugstate fragments are little affected by the nanowheel assembly.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Researcher 4 25%
Professor 3 19%
Other 2 13%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 9 56%
Computer Science 2 13%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Materials Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2012.
All research outputs
#13,365,440
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Inorganic Chemistry
#10,316
of 21,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,743
of 164,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inorganic Chemistry
#63
of 362 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,515 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 362 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.