↓ Skip to main content

From Dysfunction to Adaptation: An Interactionist Model of Dependency

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
From Dysfunction to Adaptation: An Interactionist Model of Dependency
Published in
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, April 2012
DOI 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143058
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Contrary to clinical lore, a dependent personality style is associated with active as well as passive behavior and may be adaptive in certain contexts (e.g., in fostering compliance with medical and psychotherapeutic treatment regimens). The cognitive/interactionist model conceptualizes dependency-related responding in terms of four components: (a) motivational (a marked need for guidance, support, and approval from others); (b) cognitive (a perception of oneself as powerless and ineffectual); (c) affective (a tendency to become anxious when required to function autonomously); and (d) behavioral (use of diverse self-presentation strategies to strengthen ties to potential caregivers). Clinicians' understanding of the etiology and dynamics of dependency has improved substantially in recent years; current challenges include delineating useful subtypes of dependency, developing valid symptom criteria for Dependent Personality Disorder in DSM-5 and beyond, and working effectively with dependent patients in the age of managed care.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Russia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 106 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 35 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Philosophy 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 37 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2012.
All research outputs
#24,753,774
of 34,360,889 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
#386
of 421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,486
of 212,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.