↓ Skip to main content

Screening for Type II Diabetes Mellitus in the United States: The Present and the Future

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 152)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Screening for Type II Diabetes Mellitus in the United States: The Present and the Future
Published in
Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes, June 2016
DOI 10.4137/cmed.s38247
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The number of individuals being diagnosed with type II diabetes in the United States is increasing. The screening tests for diabetes are able to detect the vast majority of diabetics. However, they do not represent the high-risk individuals who may be prone to diabetes at an earlier age. This brief communication looks at the current screening practices and the gaps in the guidelines.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 21%
Student > Master 9 13%
Lecturer 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 22 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 27 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2026.
All research outputs
#8,707,221
of 31,718,347 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes
#38
of 152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,078
of 334,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,718,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.