↓ Skip to main content

Searching for Sharp Drops in the Incidence of Pandemic A/H1N1 Influenza by Single Year of Age

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Searching for Sharp Drops in the Incidence of Pandemic A/H1N1 Influenza by Single Year of Age
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0042328
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic (pH1N1), morbidity and mortality sparing was observed among the elderly population; it was hypothesized that this age group benefited from immunity to pH1N1 due to cross-reactive antibodies generated from prior infection with antigenically similar influenza viruses. Evidence from serologic studies and genetic similarities between pH1N1 and historical influenza viruses suggest that the incidence of pH1N1 cases should drop markedly in age cohorts born prior to the disappearance of H1N1 in 1957, namely those at least 52-53 years old in 2009, but the precise range of ages affected has not been delineated.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Taiwan 1 2%
Hong Kong 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 44 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Professor 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Mathematics 3 6%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2013.
All research outputs
#12,428,062
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#108,599
of 224,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,040
of 215,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,282
of 4,380 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,380 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.