↓ Skip to main content

Fitness consequences of social network position in a wild population of forked fungus beetles (Bolitotherus cornutus)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Evolutionary Biology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Fitness consequences of social network position in a wild population of forked fungus beetles (Bolitotherus cornutus)
Published in
Journal of Evolutionary Biology, November 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02411.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

V. A. Formica, C. W. Wood, W. B. Larsen, R. E. Butterfield, M. E. Augat, H. Y. Hougen, E. D. Brodie

Abstract

Social networks describe the pattern of intraspecific interactions within a population. An individual's position in a social network often is expected to influence its fitness, but only a few studies have examined this relationship in natural populations. We investigated the fitness consequences of network position in a wild beetle population. Copulation success of male beetles positively covaried with strength (a measure of network centrality) and negatively covaried with clustering coefficient (CC) (a measure of cliquishness). Further analysis using mediation path models suggested that the activity level of individuals drove the relationships between strength and fitness almost entirely. In contrast, selection on CC was not explained by individual behaviours. Although our data suggest that social network position can experience strong sexual selection, it is also clear that the relationships between fitness and some network metrics merely reflect variation in individual-level behaviours.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 192 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 27%
Researcher 32 16%
Student > Master 28 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 27 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 121 61%
Environmental Science 20 10%
Psychology 6 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 37 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2012.
All research outputs
#20,097,309
of 24,704,144 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Evolutionary Biology
#2,573
of 2,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,241
of 248,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Evolutionary Biology
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,704,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.