| Title |
Full circumpolar migration ensures evolutionary unity in the Emperor penguin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms11842 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
Defining reliable demographic models is essential to understand the threats of ongoing environmental change. Yet, in the most remote and threatened areas, models are often based on the survey of a single population, assuming stationarity and independence in population responses. This is the case for the Emperor penguin Aptenodytes forsteri, a flagship Antarctic species that may be at high risk continent-wide before 2100. Here, using genome-wide data from the whole Antarctic continent, we reveal that this top-predator is organized as one single global population with a shared demography since the late Quaternary. We refute the view of the local population as a relevant demographic unit, and highlight that (i) robust extinction risk estimations are only possible by including dispersal rates and (ii) colony-scaled population size is rather indicative of local stochastic events, whereas the species' response to global environmental change is likely to follow a shared evolutionary trajectory. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 17% |
| Belgium | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Germany | 2 | 7% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 16 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 13 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Researcher | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 34 | 25% |