↓ Skip to main content

SNP in starch biosynthesis genes associated with nutritional and functional properties of rice

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
SNP in starch biosynthesis genes associated with nutritional and functional properties of rice
Published in
Scientific Reports, August 2012
DOI 10.1038/srep00557
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Starch is a major component of human diets. The relative contribution of variation in the genes of starch biosynthesis to the nutritional and functional properties of the rice was evaluated in a rice breeding population. Sequencing 18 genes involved in starch synthesis in a population of 233 rice breeding lines discovered 66 functional SNPs in exonic regions. Five genes, AGPS2b, Isoamylase1, SPHOL, SSIIb and SSIVb showed no polymorphism. Association analysis found 31 of the SNP were associated with differences in pasting and cooking quality properties of the rice lines. Two genes appear to be the major loci controlling traits under human selection in rice, GBSSI (waxy gene) and SSIIa. GBSSI influenced amylose content and retrogradation. Other genes contributing to retrogradation were GPT1, SSI, BEI and SSIIIa. SSIIa explained much of the variation in cooking characteristics. Other genes had relatively small effects.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 99 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 23 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 13%
Chemistry 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 24 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,616,205
of 30,096,795 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#58,881
of 168,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,299
of 194,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#97
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,096,795 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 168,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.