↓ Skip to main content

Vitamins

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatrics in Review, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Vitamins
Published in
Pediatrics in Review, August 2012
DOI 10.1542/pir.33-8-339
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

• Based on strong research evidence, all infants should receive 400 IU/day of vitamin D beginning in the first few days of age to prevent vitamin D deficiency and rickets. • Based on strong research evidence, children and adolescents age >1 year may require as much as 600IU/day of vitamin D. • Based on strong research evidence, all newborns should receive 1 mg of vitamin K at birth to prevent vitamin K deficiency bleeding. • Based on strong research evidence, preconceptional and pregnant women should be supplemented with folate to decrease the likelihood of neural tube defects.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Bangladesh 1 1%
Unknown 86 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Other 12 13%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 19 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 21 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2022.
All research outputs
#20,300,192
of 32,178,296 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics in Review
#729
of 1,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,907
of 203,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics in Review
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,178,296 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.