↓ Skip to main content

Probiotics in neonatology

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Paediatrics & Child Health, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Probiotics in neonatology
Published in
Journal of Paediatrics & Child Health, August 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02508.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leah Hickey, Susan E Jacobs, Suzanne M Garland, on behalf of the ProPrems Study Group

Abstract

Probiotics are micro-organisms that confer health benefits on the host. Postulated mechanisms include: increasing resistance of the mucosal barrier to migration of bacteria and their toxins by strengthening intestinal cell junctions, modification of host response to microbial products, augmentation of immunoglobulin A mucosal responses, enhancement of enteral nutrition to inhibit the growth of pathogens; production of antimicrobial proteins; and competitive exclusion of potential pathogens. Published meta-analyses and systematic reviews report the effects of probiotics on important clinical outcomes in neonates. This paper will review the evidence for probiotic supplementation in neonatology, with a focus on preterm infants.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 77 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Other 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 25 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 25 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2016.
All research outputs
#9,609,775
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Paediatrics & Child Health
#1,190
of 3,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,083
of 214,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Paediatrics & Child Health
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.