↓ Skip to main content

Zika Virus Disease in Colombia — Preliminary Report

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
94 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
419 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
49 Facebook pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users
reddit
13 Redditors
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
580 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Zika Virus Disease in Colombia — Preliminary Report
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, June 2016
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1604037
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Background Colombia began official surveillance for Zika virus disease (ZVD) in August 2015. In October 2015, an outbreak of ZVD was declared after laboratory-confirmed disease was identified in nine patients. Methods Using the national population-based surveillance system, we assessed patients with clinical symptoms of ZVD from August 9, 2015, to April 2, 2016. Laboratory test results and pregnancy outcomes were evaluated for a subgroup of pregnant women. Concurrently, we investigated reports of microcephaly for evidence of congenital ZVD. Results By April 2, 2016, there were 65,726 cases of ZVD reported in Colombia, of which 2485 (4%) were confirmed by means of reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) assay. The overall reported incidence of ZVD among female patients was twice that in male patients. A total of 11,944 pregnant women with ZVD were reported in Colombia, with 1484 (12%) of these cases confirmed on RT-PCR assay. In a subgroup of 1850 pregnant women, more than 90% of women who were reportedly infected during the third trimester had given birth, and no infants with apparent abnormalities, including microcephaly, have been identified. A majority of the women who contracted ZVD in the first or second trimester were still pregnant at the time of this report. Among the cases of microcephaly investigated from January 2016 through April 2016, four patients had laboratory evidence of congenital ZVD; all were born to asymptomatic mothers who were not included in the ZVD surveillance system. Conclusions Preliminary surveillance data in Colombia suggest that maternal infection with the Zika virus during the third trimester of pregnancy is not linked to structural abnormalities in the fetus. However, the monitoring of the effect of ZVD on pregnant women in Colombia is ongoing. (Funded by Colombian Instituto Nacional de Salud and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 419 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 580 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 563 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 94 16%
Researcher 84 14%
Student > Bachelor 63 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 8%
Student > Postgraduate 39 7%
Other 129 22%
Unknown 127 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 165 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 36 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 5%
Other 95 16%
Unknown 147 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2026.
All research outputs
#16,761
of 34,540,392 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#691
of 38,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200
of 345,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#6
of 297 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,540,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 297 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.