You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
股関節伸展および外転保持課題に対する負荷量の変化が中殿筋,大殿筋の各線維の筋電図積分値に与える影響
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Rigakuryoho Kagaku, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1589/rika.33.121 |
| Authors |
Futoshi KATANAZAKA, Takamitsu KUSUNOKI, Takashi HAYATA, Keisuke AKAMATSU, Masashi FUJIMOTO, Toshihiro OHNUMA, Hirofumi WATANABE, Naritoshi MIWA, Toshiaki SUZUKI |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2023.
All research outputs
#15,523,434
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Rigakuryoho Kagaku
#67
of 291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,876
of 449,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rigakuryoho Kagaku
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 291 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.