↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparative efficacy of different exercise interventions in chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Published in
BMJ Open, August 2020
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036050
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Master 10 8%
Researcher 9 8%
Lecturer 5 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 62 52%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 24 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 8%
Sports and Recreations 7 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 64 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#20,677,432
of 32,902,820 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#17,770
of 29,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,271
of 446,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#412
of 689 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,902,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 689 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.