| Title |
NIR fluorescence for monitoring in vivo scaffold degradation along with stem cell tracking in bone tissue engineering
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Materials, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120267 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Soon Hee Kim, Ji Hoon Park, Jin Seon Kwon, Jae Gu Cho, Kate G Park, Chan Hum Park, James J Yoo, Anthony Atala, Hak Soo Choi, Moon Suk Kim, Sang Jin Lee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| India | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 6 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#8,049,150
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Materials
#4,491
of 10,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,822
of 427,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Materials
#35
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.