You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Internal tides can provide thermal refugia that will buffer some coral reefs from future global warming
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-70372-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Curt D. Storlazzi, Olivia M. Cheriton, Ruben van Hooidonk, Zhongxiang Zhao, Russell Brainard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 27% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 87% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 20% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 22 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 33 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,110,012
of 24,974,461 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#32,907
of 136,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,412
of 405,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#977
of 3,709 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,974,461 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136,884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,709 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.