↓ Skip to main content

Computational Neuroscience: Theoretical Insights into Brain Function

Overview of attention for book
Computational Neuroscience: Theoretical Insights into Brain Function
Elsevier
Attention for Chapter: Computational Neuroscience: Theoretical Insights into Brain Function
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Chapter title
Computational Neuroscience: Theoretical Insights into Brain Function
Book title
Computational Neuroscience: Theoretical Insights into Brain Function
Published in
Progress in Brain Research, January 2007
DOI 10.1016/s0079-6123(06)65012-7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-0-444-52823-0
Authors

Marder, Eve, Tobin, Anne-Elise, Grashow, Rachel, Eve Marder, Anne-Elise Tobin, Rachel Grashow

Abstract

We describe theoretical and experimental studies that demonstrate that a given pattern of neuronal activity can be produced by variable sets of underlying conductances. Experimental work demonstrates that individual identified neurons in different animals may show variations as large as 2-5 fold in the conductance densities of specific ion channels. Theoretical work shows that models with this range of variation in many of their maximal conductances can produce similar activity. Together, these observations suggest that neurons and networks may be less tightly tuned than previously thought. Consequently, we argue that instead of attempting to construct single canonical models of neuronal function, it might be more useful to construct and analyze large families of models that give similar behavior.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 10%
United Kingdom 3 4%
Sweden 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
France 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 50 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 40%
Researcher 15 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Student > Master 4 6%
Professor 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 34%
Neuroscience 15 22%
Psychology 4 6%
Physics and Astronomy 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 8 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2015.
All research outputs
#5,904,928
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Brain Research
#390
of 1,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,159
of 157,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Brain Research
#24
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.