XBT Science: assessment of instrumental biases and errors

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, July 2016

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs: 2 blogs
policy: 3 policy sources

twitter: 4 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 61 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 4 X posts from 4 X users, with an upper bound of 3,330 followers.

@RogTallbloke @2C_increase @DawnTJ90 @ejwwest @LochChesney @BJChippindale @johnson_wrjohn1 @EDavidAn @steve_niemiec @Robert76907841 @morme1 @Climatehope2 @KeillerDon @moonrakin @BkennedyBarbara @NeasdenParade @Anvndarnamn5 @ZanderNoriega @canncr @jwicke…

@ScienceNotDogma Hey Peter. Very surprising you’re unaware. Technical working groups have been reporting on Argo/XBT bias and error for years https://t.co/hr14pMc83Z.

@ClimateOfGavin There are significant progress wrt mapping (https://t.co/fGtx7AmMEV) & instrumental error (https://t.co/YPlTqN8AEY). OHC gets more reliable

BAMS: XBT Science: Assessment of Instrumental Biases and Errors https://t.co/63INRIsVY1 https://t.co/7U0ZJLkgAC

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity.